Researchers have revealed a lack of willingness among consumers in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) to pay a premium for conservation agriculture products. Despite recognising the critical socio-environmental issues related to traditional agricultural practices, the majority of consumers are more concerned with the immediate costs of commodities.
The University of Arkansas research team, consisting of Willy Mulimbi, Lanier Nalley, Rodolfo M. Nayga Jr., and Arya Gaduh, conducted a comprehensive survey in Bukavu, DRC, involving 600 participants. They employed a double-bounded dichotomous choice valuation method to explore participants’ willingness-to-pay (WTP) for maize produced using conservation agriculture.
According to Rodolfo M. Nayga Jr., “Our study finds that only those consumers who identify themselves as farmers are willing to pay a premium.”
The results underline that the immediate economic concerns of most consumers overshadow the longer-term benefits of adopting conservation agriculture practices, which include mitigating deforestation and potential reduction in violence against women in rural areas.
The researchers emphasise that conservation agriculture could help alleviate two pressing issues in the DRC: deforestation, a by-product of the prevalent slash-and-burn farming methods, and the heightened risk of assault women face when they need to venture far from their homes for fertile lands.
Nalley noted, “The overwhelming majority of participants in this study thought deforestation was an important issue in the DRC (86%) and that women in agriculture were at greater risk of assault than those in urban areas (94%). However, this prior knowledge did little in the way of eliciting premiums for conservation agriculture and its potential to reduce both risks.”
The findings suggest that adoption of conservation agriculture may need to come through more tangible incentives, such as increased yields or reduced costs at the farm gate, rather than relying on post-harvest premiums.
Nalley further stated, “This study’s key finding seems to confirm that most consumers in LICs are likely more concerned with the price of a commodity rather than attributes associated with its production.”
Despite these significant revelations, the researchers advised caution in making broad conclusions from the study due to the relatively small sample size and the use of convenience sampling.
“Future research on willingness to pay for conservation agriculture in the DRC should focus on a more robust sampling technique that ensures a representative sample which could mitigate the unbalanced and small sample size of subsets present in this study,” the academics noted.
The researchers also recommended that future efforts should focus on increasing funding to enhance conservation agriculture productivity, making it more profitable, and thus leading to wider adoption by agricultural producers. They further suggested that the international community should also consider funding deforestation reduction initiatives in low-income countries to tackle the twin issues of environmental degradation and violence against women.
This study has shed light on the stark disconnect between consumer understanding and willingness to financially support conservation agriculture in the DRC, highlighting the urgent need for continued research and effective policy-making in this crucial sector.
READ NEXT: Conservation agriculture strategies enhance soil quality in E. Cape
